Database Compatibility Fuzzing Sprint
48-hour compatibility pass for database, sync, and query teams

Find one real engine or SDK bug before your users do.

I run a focused fuzzing and differential-testing sprint against one narrow surface: SQL compatibility, query planning, schema rewrites, sync edge cases, SDK adapters, or import/export paths. The deliverable is a reduced repro, a fix PR when feasible, and a maintainer-grade writeup.

Recent 90-minute trace 2 PRs + 1 open issue
Differential fuzzer signalSQLite succeeded while Turso rejected a temp-trigger schema rewrite
Find
Three-statement reproReduced to CREATE TABLE, CREATE TEMP TRIGGER, ALTER TABLE RENAME COLUMN
Reduce
Patch and testsNormal and MVCC regression, CLI repro, exact fuzzer seed all pass
Fix
Upstream PRTurso PR #7144 was submitted from a clean branch with the regression attached
Ship
Invalid SQL mutation reportSQLite rejects an undefined CTE column while Turso accepts the UPDATE and mutates data
Report

Fixed-scope sprint

Best fit when you have a risky compatibility surface but not enough time for broad QA.

Diagnostic

$500
  • One target surface reviewed.
  • One reduced repro or risk report when a bug is found.
  • Short mitigation plan if no clean fix is feasible.

48-hour sprint

$1,000
  • Focused fuzzing or differential test harness pass.
  • Reduced repro and failing test.
  • Patch PR when the fix is inside a small, safe scope.

Handoff plus

$1,500
  • Everything in the sprint.
  • Repro suite and maintainer notes.
  • Follow-up hardening checklist for your team.

Shipped proof

These are real public artifacts, not screenshots of intent.

Send one risky surface.

Good inputs: a repo link, a failing compatibility area, a query feature, an SDK adapter, or one engine behavior you do not fully trust.